Home
Harrowgate Hill Community Link
header1.jpg
Harrowgate Farm Play Area
Written by Mark Burton   
Thursday, 27 August 2009

Harrowgate_Farm_play_area_2.JPGThe Harrowgate Farm Play Area debate has been a long drawn out affair first staring way back in the autumn of 2006, before I was elected as ward Councillor. Back then many residents were up in arms as a result of youths causing a nuisance - now classified as ‘anti-social behaviour’ (ASB) - on the Harrowgate Farm estate, before and after congregating on the Play Area. Meetings were held with the then ward Councillor’s… where fists were banged on desks, voices were raised and people shook their heads in despair and disbelief over what action should be taken. Some demanded walkways closed, that the area be patrolled more often and the play area be removed.

Then, after the elections of May 2007, it was left on my lap to resolve. Previous Councillors had sown a seed for the play area be relocated to a more observational location, which was hoped would deter youths from causing a nuisance, and this is where I picked up the gauntlet. Just two months in to the job and I was holding meeting’s with various officers of the council and representatives from all three developers; Wimpey, Persimmon and Yuill.

What I imagined as being a straight forward solution, which began with consulting residents asking for their thoughts, turned out to be one of the most complicated drawn out cases I have ever worked on. The first complication which came to light was, as the provision of the play area is a planning requirement, to have it removed/relocated would involve a variation to the original planning application - which the developers would have to submit. At first the developers had agreed to do this but as the consultation dragged on and a ‘Save the Play Area’ group was formed, the developers then declined to do this, in their view they had done ‘all that is necessary to discharge the planning condition’.

The second complication was that consultation proved a fifty/50 split, whilst residents who had experiences of ASB wanted to see the back of the play area others thought it was a cop-out by the council in not resolving the true issue - ASB. So we were left with two options; do nothing or make the decision to relocate the play area. Doing nothing meant letting down all the residents who had experiences of ASB and I didn’t want that to happen. My thoughts were that if the developers could contribute some funding and Groundwork could also try to identify other areas where external funding may be available to supplement the relocation with further additions to the equipment perhaps that might weigh the balance. The play area could be relocated to the recreational land situated at the bottom of Mayfair Road which would be within walking distance of Harrowgate Farm and also provide play for the residents in that area too.

The first step would be for the Council to adopt the play and to then submit a variation of the original planning application to the planning committee. To do this the Council would have to show reason for variation to the original planning application.

In addition to the issues of ASB, the play area being situated under pylons and out of view, the land the play area is built on is above a main pipe of Northumbrian Water and the construction of the land above that pipe has caused the play area to slip, which can be evidenced by the cracking around the perimeter, as identified right from our very first meetings - before I first made a request for the play area’s removal/relocation. The Council’s Engineers had identified movement with the play area floor covering and some of the fencing had fallen away, equipment had become unbalanced and holes had appeared in the soft covering. Which lead to the third complication, the support of Northumbrian Water to show that vibrations from the pipe had caused movement to the equipment, which I understand Northumbrian Water were unwilling to do however, they said that no further expansion to the play area could take place. Thus, Council Officers had no option but to abandon any possibility of securing the evidence for supporting any planning application for its relocation/removal and decided to retain the existing play area.

Which leaves us where we are today - waiting for funding from all three developers to bring the play area back up to an acceptable standard so that the Council can adopt it, although it is highly probable that the play area will slip again. The sum to have been collected was £45k but reduced to £30k as a result of the downturn and the council is currently awaiting payment from one of the developers who has gone into liquidation.

At the end of the day residents are entitled to some peace and quiet in their own homes, and it is clear that people living close to the play area were having their quality of life seriously undermined by the actions of an unruly minority. Harrowgate Farm has been without this play area for over two years now and from what I understand reports of ASB have reduced substantially. Residents living closest to the play area who were being subjected to regular disturbances by gangs of youths, sometimes into the early hours of the morning, are much happier. Some might say this is as a result of the play area being fenced off and in an unusable condition since July 2007.

In anticipation of the reopening of the play area (there is no date) I have asked the Police to prioritise the Harrowgate Farm Play Area and depending upon future levels of ASB issues, I have in mind to raise a request for CCTV, however CCTV would only monitor the play area and not the estate in general - as we all know most of the nuisance caused to residents occurred as youths made there way to and from the play area.

Last Updated ( Thursday, 27 August 2009 )
 
Bus Service to Glebe, Laburnum and Mayfair Road
Written by Mark Burton   
Tuesday, 25 August 2009

arriva.JPGAs you may remember some time ago Arriva said that they could not service Glebe, Laburnum and Mayfair Road commercially. Alan Milburn (MP) and I talked directly to Arriva and Darlington Borough Council to try to come up with some form of method to improve the junctions here so that Arriva could service this area.

After all avenues were explored a decision was reached to ask Cabinet for additional funding for the Council to subsidise this route, and after some debate, the go-ahead was given to tender for this service. Having said that - I would have preferred Arriva to have serviced this area without the need for any subsidisation.

Tenders are now in and a Council meeting was held to assess and evaluate the results from the tender round however, Arriva have now suggested a different method of serving Glebe, Laburnum and Mayfair Road during the day and this may not be within the terms of the Cabinet instruction.
 
With Arriva talking about commercial route changes, after tenders have been sought, to cover Glebe, Laburnum and Mayfair Road during the day on a commercial basis a report is being prepared for Cabinet on 8 September. This has not been an easy process, but officers, working with Arriva, are hoping to come up with a new route that will cover Glebe, Laburnum, Mayfair Road and Whinfield day and evening on a half hour basis.

I am still hoping to see this service introduce by the 1 November but following the Cabinet meeting on the 8 September this may now depend upon the Department of Transport (DfT) and any changes Arriva may submit to them with regards to their commercial routes.

Last Updated ( Tuesday, 25 August 2009 )
 
Additional Lighting Requests
Written by Mark Burton   
Tuesday, 25 August 2009

Lighting.JPGRequest made for a review of street light funding and prioritisation through the Economy and Environment Scrutiny Committee.

Here in Harrowgate Hill there are four outstanding requests for additional street lighting. When a request is made for additional street lighting, it seems that any available funding is spent on the next one on the list.

There's a relatively small budget for new street lighting (10K), which is awarded to areas where there is evidence of ASB - but I'm unsure as to what qualifies as ASB (what the criteria's are) and, should there be more areas in need than can be budgeted for, how they might be prioritised.

There is a set criteria and formula to determine need and prioritisation for the hardening of grass verges and I would like to see a similar formula drawn up for additional street lighting. And this is why I have made a request for a review of street light funding and prioritisation through the Economy and Environment Scrutiny Committee.

Scrutiny Committees have an important role in helping to develop new policies and making suggestions to the decision makers.  They have an input in developing the budget as they are not taking decisions they have more time to evaluate different options and come up with innovative ideas.

Scrutiny Committees spend the majority of their time carrying out policy reviews.  This involves carrying out a detailed assessment of a Council service or a topic which affects the lives of local people are able to undertake specific reviews of particular topics, taking into consideration the wishes of Members and/or the general public.

Last Updated ( Tuesday, 25 August 2009 )
 
Three birds, one stone
Written by Mark Burton   
Tuesday, 04 August 2009

allotments.JPGClosure of a footpath and the creation of a new mini allotment site could see; the waiting list for allotments here in Harrowgate Hill cut; help reduce Longfield School’s continuous re-fencing costs; and at the same time, answer resident’s prayers for assistance with anti-social behavioural issues.

The area in question lies within Ridgeway and I visited the area to understand more about the concerns of residents and the area in question. The footpath leads to a very strange area and appears to have little real public value at the moment. Residents told me that the area has never been used by anyone for any event and that the grass area was regularly cut and litter picked by Street Scene. The green area, sum 827sq meters, is surrounded by resident’s gardens and the perimeter fence of Longfield School runs along the back edge. The area, which definitely belongs to Darlington Borough Council, could provide around 6 full or 8 half allotments.

Youths often visit the area late at night, mostly to access Longfield School grounds and the perimeter fence is used as a cut-through... once they've unscrewed the metal fencing. Residents often have youths late at night banging on the walls of their homes and recently a front fence was pulled right out. Along with numerous other complaints and issues raised by resident’s, in the early hours a couple of weeks ago, youths antagonised one elderly gentleman, in his own home, to the point where he suffered a severe angina attack.

Residents on Ridgeway are working together to resolve this issue and are very keen on what has been proposed. There has been a 100% response to a petition in support of the suggestion of allotments here. The idea of allotments first came from residents and I fully support that idea. I’ll be working with Council Officers over the next couple of months and hopefully by the end of October we’ll see this area transformed into something we can all be proud of.

I would like to hear from any one who was with or who witnessed a group of youths in the Ridgeway area of Harrowgate Hill pulling down a resident's fence.

Cllr. M Burton

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 05 August 2009 )
 
Digging near Drinkfield Marsh
Written by Mark Burton   
Sunday, 02 August 2009

marsh_digging.JPGAs you may be aware tipping and processing works have been taking place in between the tip, on Whessoe Road, and Drinkfield Marsh for a number of months. The operator there has maintained that he does not require planning permission for these works as he considers he can rely upon a planning permission that dates back to 1968.

A meeting was held with representatives of the Environment Agency and the HSE and whilst it is clear that there is evidence of various activities taking place there, they take the view that it would be very difficult to act in the current circumstances. I find this position to be rather frustrating for residents who believe the site operator is 'chancing his arm' with all of the regulatory authorities and has little regard or respect for the law.

I've received numerous complaints from lots of residents living on Harrowgate Farm who have been disturbed by the amount of work that has been taking place at Drinkfield Marsh. Many have been unable to relax in their own homes and are sick and tired of the constant noise coming from all of the processing works that have been taking place there at all hours - from first thing in the morning to late at night and at weekends too.

The Council have now served a Stop Notice, under the Town and Country Planning Act that specifies the cessation of works with immediate effect, allowing 28 days for further investigation work to take place during which time, the Council and the owner of the land will be working closely together to resolve the situation.

It's taken quite some time, but action has now been taken and I fully support the Council who have served a stop notice to the operator. The question now is who is going to be held responsible for the clearing, levelling and restoring of this land back to its original condition. Clearly there's still an awful lot of work to be done to resolve this situation.

I would be grateful if any residents who witness any activity on this site over the next 28 days to get in touch with Mr. Dave Coates, Principal Planning Officer, Darlington Borough Council on 01325 388 609  or mobile 07970 037 232 or you can email him at This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

Cllr. M Burton

Last Updated ( Tuesday, 04 August 2009 )
 
<< Start < Prev 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next > End >>

Results 91 - 99 of 378
 
Events Calendar
« < July 2010 > »
S M T W T F S
27 28 29 30 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
« < August 2010 > »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
Snippet
Temporary Road Closure from 9th August 2010 for 2 weeks
At Thompson Street East junction with Wylam Avenue, Locomotive Street and Hercules Street. Access to Kingsway will be via its western side only. An alternative route for Thompson Street East will be signed via Salters Lane North, North Road, Thompson Street East and vice versa. An alternative route for Wylam Avenue, Locomotive Street and Hercules Street will be signed via Whinfield Road, Salters Lane South, Morpeth Avenue, Springfield Road and vice versa. The closure is necessary to enable road surfacing works by Darlington Borough Council.

Former Harrowgate Hill Infants School
Once owned by Darlington Building Society - Has now been sold to Walter Thompson who will be redeveloping the site.

Road resurfacing
I’m pleased to say the Council will final- ly be implementing road resurfacing work for the junction area of Longfield Road and Whessoe Road.
The work will take place during the school holidays and drivers are urged to avoid the area whilst this work takes place.

PACT - Police meet Residents meeting dates
Held at the Harrowgate Club on Salters Lane North at 6:30pm
28 July
25 August
22 September
20 October
17 November
15 December

Rear lane leading to Bensham Park
Although the Council does not own this land they do have right of access over it. The Council will, in the near future when resources are available, put road plainings down to improve the surface

Harrowgate Farm Play Area
The Council has finally reached an agreement with persimmons with regards to the land transfer and once the paperwork is complete the Council will repair the play area. I'll post further updates as soon as I hear anything further
 
Google Translations